84% of participants agreed* that the meeting advanced the field: Greater understanding was achieved and the discussion was at a more advanced level than other meetings attended. (11% neutral)

“Very high level of goodwill, cooperation, and technical discourse.”

84% of participants agreed that the meeting encouraged truth-telling and discussion was honest. (16% neutral)

“Excellent meeting. Increased my understanding about the issues we face with regard to genetic testing and instilled a sense of urgency, as these issues will dramatically increase over time.”

92% of participants agreed that the content of the meeting was at the right level.

“Best one of its kind on this topic because it was inclusive of multiple stakeholders.”

77% of participants agreed that the panel discussions without PowerPoint presentations were effective. (15% neutral)

“The lack of PowerPoint was fantastic—I learned far more from actively listening to presenters who had to think on their feet than from a series of prefabricated slides.”

88% of participants agreed that the binder materials provided were helpful. (8% neutral)

 “This meeting was a great value.”

74% of participants agreed that the length of the meeting was appropriate. (21% neutral)

“I liked the format. I found it a refreshing change.”

*“Agreed” includes participants who agreed and strongly agreed with the statement.